Blog Entry 6

Chapter 5: Regulating Internet Content

What is your ethical position? Do you think this is an appropriate agenda in terms of invisibly policing the internet? Since your boss has presented you with this brief, in the case that you do not agree with the ramifications of policing the internet in this way, do you have any practical alternative but to undertake the work? (Here we assume that your boss is insistent that the work should be carried out by you.) What-if any-real objections do you have? Do you feel this is encroaching upon the liberty of the individual? Are your views influenced by the nature of the content of the website? For example, would your views be any different if the website related directly to terrorism or other forms of political extremism? To what extent do you think that the internet is currently being policed - not only in terms of monitoring those who enter particular websites or who enter contentious chat room area or the likes?

· In that case, I’d rather quit my job and find others that will fulfill my interest and mold me as a true person rather than to be made as a tool of mass destruction of mankind. My boss thinks like it’s just purely business publishing different post and articles at any topic at any costs. Well joining in the publishing type of companies like that one lies all of the consequences of to a spreader of sin and chaos, so I’d rather collect trashes of bottles and papers than working in offices that is full of stains and a drawer of waste in time.

· Like in my previous reactions about of what I think of it in ethical aspects, well for me, the act of which wrong in the first place can never be a right in the future, it may just lessen the level of it’s ethical wrongfulness.